PRESS CONFERENCE:
Tuesday. March 27, 11:30 - 1pm
Rutgers Business School, 100 Rockefeller Rd. Piscataway, NJ
https://www.facebook.com/events/171815676804477/
On March 27, an all day symposium on the Rutgers University campus co-sponsored by the “Miller Center for Community Protection and Resilience” and by the Office of Rutgers President Barchi entitled “Fighting Hate While Preserving Freedom: A Best Practices Forum” will occur.
Tuesday. March 27, 11:30 - 1pm
Rutgers Business School, 100 Rockefeller Rd. Piscataway, NJ
https://www.facebook.com/events/171815676804477/
On March 27, an all day symposium on the Rutgers University campus co-sponsored by the “Miller Center for Community Protection and Resilience” and by the Office of Rutgers President Barchi entitled “Fighting Hate While Preserving Freedom: A Best Practices Forum” will occur.
The
Miller Center for Community Protection and Resilience is connected to the Intelligence Community Center for Academic Excellence (IC CAE), a US
intelligence program sponsored by a $2M grant from the Defense Intelligence
Agency (DIA). This program offers an intelligence minor, paid stipends for
field work with the FBI, NSA and CIA, regularly features guest speakers from
those and other intelligence and police agencies, and also provides training
for current agents of the various US intelligence agencies. It is also a
recruitment operation for these agencies, using faculty members, administrators
and even students as recruitment agents.
Agencies operating through the IC CAE include DIA, NSA, CIA, DHS,
ICE and FBI.
Ostensibly
the forum being sponsored by these spy agencies of the National Security State
is focused in part on the topic of Anti-Semitism with a featured speaker from
the ADL (Anti Defamation League) and another from B’nai Shalom.
The
featured keynote speaker is former head of the Department of Homeland Security
Jeh Johnson, who served during Barack Obama’s second term as president,
presiding over the deportation of approximately 1.5 million immigrants.
There
is nothing wrong with talking about ways to oppose hatred in its many forms; it
is, however, a dangerous situation when you have several agencies of the
national security state teaming up with university administrators with a
framework tying the topic to issues of freedom and First Amendment rights.
These
agencies are all steeped in a history of direct participation using very
extreme measures in suppressing freedom – of people within the United States as
well as in the rest of the world. They also have an interest in
preventing students, faculty, staff, alumni, and the community from mounting an
organizing drive against the repressive and destructrive policies they are
carrying out. They are the last entities that should be involved in
defining limits to freedom and First Amendment rights under the guise of
“fighting hate.”
This
brief commentary piece can not provide a complete history lesson of the
nefarious role of these agencies. Briefly though, the following are some
reasons why the agencies mentioned should not be in the business of defining
what are “best practices” for respecting freedom and opposing hate:
DHS / ICE - The keynote speaker Jeh Johnson is the former head of the Department of Homeland Security which commands Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). He presided over the deportation of 1.5 million (about) immigrants during the second term of Barack Obama—an immigration crackdown that continues under the Trump Administration. ICE is currently targeting many activists in the struggle for immigrant rights for deportation. The ICE crackdown is contributing to a climate of anti-immigrant hatred. Many are being forced into privately run detention centers and are being pressed into forced servitude/literal enslavement. ICE has nothing to offer to a conversation about freedom or opposition to hatred.
CIA – The current
nominee to head the CIA, Haspel is literally a torturer who destroyed damning
evidence. The CIA presides over part of the US drone strike programs
responsible for the deaths of 1000s of civilians including women and children.
The CIA’s nefarious history includes every kind of violent and criminal
operations, including but not limited to: death squad promotion, sabotage,
money laundering, drug trafficking, sponsorship of coup d’etats against
democratically elected representatives or governments opposed by US
multinational corporations. Should the CIA be defining limits of free
speech at RU? It is also relevant that the CIA aided a New York Police Department intelligence unit that set up and maintained a "safe house" near the College Avenue campus at Rutgers for the purpose of spying on Rutgers Muslim students and New Brunswick residents.
FBI – Without going
into a history lesson on the FBI role in suppressing dissent in the US, right
now, the FBI has a Black Identity Extremist desk that is making an argument for
a crackdown targeting Black activism—should this be what is going to define
what free speech at Rutgers is?
DIA - the
Pentagon’s intelligence agency, is conducting warfare, threats, operations,
threatening exercises and maneuvers on every corner of the planet via drone
hitting, collaborating with the occupation of Palestine, threatening Korea,
Venezuela, Iran—so do you think there is going to be respect from the DIA for
the free speech of the Rutgers community that is about to embark on a campaign
of resistance to these warfare activities? Do we want DIA defining limits
of freedom?
NSA - As most now
know, the NSA is violating the privacy of everyone using any kind of electronic
communications, collecting everything from the internet, cell phones, and other
devices. The vast data is made available to other intelligence agencies
and police agencies through the FISA courts, which approve over 90% of the
requests to allow access to the data.
It
is disingenuous for these intelligence agencies to team up with the
Anti-Defamation League and B’nai Shalom organizations for this event.
They are couching the event as a defense against anti-Semitism. The connection that is being attempted is in
the context of national and local efforts that attempt to link opposition to
Israel’s policies with anti-Semitism. By extension, this would further label opposition to aspects of US foreign policy in support of Israeli policies including military
support, the growing direct US involvement with Israel in the occupation and in
operations in Syria, in addition to the targeting of Iran and allied forces, as
anti-Semitic. There are measures being advanced at the national level and at
the state level throughout the United States that restrict and outlaw various
forms of opposition to such policies, such as the Boycott, Divestment,
Sanctions (BDS) movement.
Movements
of dissent on college campuses, including fighting for increased wages,
opposing US foreign policy, opposing University investments for various
reasons, calling for free education or opposing tuition hikes, engage a
diverse body of student, faculty and staff activists with Arab and Muslim
students often at the forefront of such efforts. The smear of Palestine
support and solidarity as “anti-Semitic” is a common tactic. It is then no surprise that the Office of
Rutgers President Barchi has teamed up with the National Security State through
its $2 Million DIA-funded IC CAE and is hiding its attempt to curtail
student and faculty freedoms along with First Amendment rights under the guise
of fighting anti-Semitism.
Anti-Semitism
must be opposed in all of its manifestations; however, the Rutgers community
and supporters of higher education across the country must reject the couching
of an effort to undermine and restrict student activism under the thinly veiled
guise of “fighting hatred.”
It
is clear that the national security state is using Rutgers – not only in its
effort to undermine opposition to its policies on the Rutgers campus but also
as a means to thrust its opposition to student activism in academia throughout
the nation.
Universities
in general and students, faculty, and staff in particular are facing adversity
and challenges on many fronts. The condition of this nation and world is
precarious, and there is a growing likelihood of the US slipping from its
current state of low to medium level warfare in many theatres around the planet
towards full-scale ultimate warfare.
At
times like this, such a cynical attempt by the national security state to
control dissent must be confronted, protested, rejected, and sent packing!
CIA
OFF CAMPUS!
SHUT
DOWN THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE (IC CAE)
For
more on the topic:
The massive intelligence operation at Rutgers New
Brunswick has been the subject of a news report in the Daily Targum, and a blog piece at this site, an article at the New Brunswick Todaynews site, an article in the #NJAntiWarAgenda paper which is also published at our website.
thoughtful and informative article. Thank you. I was wondering how this fascist state being developed would devise methods for repressing dissent in the more sophisticated and subtle ways that the general population would accept. Clearly, defining so called acceptable dissent, which in many ways is already the case, is the answer. Your article shows this plan is already in effect.
ReplyDelete